FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 13, 2018   HAMILTON, ON – An Owen Sound teacher is taking home a prestigious John Rozema Award for Teacher Excellence. The Rozema Awards recognize teachers at independent Christian schools in Ontario who nurture student character, local community engagement, and improved school culture in addition to academic performance. This year’s winners excelled in teaching independent Christian school students to care for their communities and natural environment. Cara Barwell at Timothy Christian School took the $5,000 award in the Excellence in Elementary School Teaching category. Her students visited the Bognor Marsh three times throughout the school year, learning about seasonal changes. They created a calendar featuring their own artwork and research on marsh wildlife to display what they’d learned about this sensitive and valuable ecosystem. “Independent Christian schools deserve recognition for their commitment to excellence in teaching, which is why the Rozema Awards exist,” said Dr. Beth Green, Cardus Education program director. “The caliber of this year’s winners and shortlisted entries shows that all Christian schools are a vital part of Ontario’s education system.” Teachers from Hamilton and London won in the Global Perspectives, Arts, and Group Excellence, and Secondary School categories, rounding out this year’s winners. The June 13th awards reception in Hamilton handed out a total of $28,000 in awards to be used for the winning teachers’ professional development. Videos of the winners and runners-up are available online. The John Rozema Awards for Teacher Excellence are presented in partnership with the Christian School Foundation. -30- MEDIA INQUIRIES      Daniel Proussalidis  Cardus - Director of Communications  613-899-5174  dproussalidis@cardus.ca

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE May 17, 2018  CALGARY – Think tank Cardus has sparked the beginning of a new, national conversation on renewing Canadian federalism.  “Sometimes you have to get out of the Toronto-Ottawa-Montreal triangle to start a new conversation about building a grander vision for Canada,” said Cardus President and CEO Michael Van Pelt. “And one of the best places to do that is the vibrant city of Calgary, with its frontier spirit and willingness to challenge the status quo.” Cardus gathered an audience of business, political, and civil society leaders at the Glenbow Museum to hear from three deep-thinking Albertans – UCP Leader Jason Kenney, University of Calgary Faculty of Law Journalist-in-Residence Jen Gerson, and Oxford House Executive Director Patrick Nixon – about a federalism that goes beyond jurisdictional disputes and disagreements over transfer payments.  Mr. Kenney delivered opening remarks, taking a step back from the politics of the day to examine the foundations of federalism in the face of new social and economic realities. Ms. Gerson and Mr. Nixon served as respondents, offering their own thoughts and participating in a moderated discussion with Mr. Kenney focused on developing a shared sense of the common good within a pluralistic society. “It was exciting to hear acknowledgement that governments have a role in building the common good, but that they also have their limits,” says discussion moderator and Cardus Executive Vice President Ray Pennings. “That opens up the possibility of renewing the role for all the mediating institutions between governments on the one hand, and the market on the other. One of those institutions is civil society – charities, faith communities, and volunteer organizations – that must play a bigger role in Canada. We’ll have a renewed federalism when we make space for civil society to help our families, workplaces, and communities flourish.” To arrange for interviews with a Cardus spokesperson, please, contact Daniel Proussalidis. -30- MEDIA INQUIRIES    Daniel Proussalidis  Cardus - Director of Communications  613-899-5174  dproussalidis@cardus.ca    

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE May 9, 2018 OTTAWA – Today, Cardus launched the Cardus Religious Freedom Institute (CRFI) – a new national advocate for the defence of domestic religious freedom. Rev. Dr. Andrew Bennett, who will lead the CRFI, says the new Institute comes at a crucial time in our national life. “When Canadians are compelled to violate their consciences in order to participate in a public program like Canada Summer Jobs or regulators of the legal profession can marginalize a faith-based university because the school’s religious beliefs, you know we’ve reached a new low in Canadian religious freedom,” he says. “Respect for public faith has degraded so dramatically that we need to re-educate our public institutions about it.” A multi-faith advisory council will provide counsel to Rev. Dr. Bennett and the CRFI.  The CRFI will research Canadian religious freedom issues in order to educate Canadians and to strengthen the national network of religious freedom advocates. “Central to the Institute’s work is the understanding that religious freedom is the fundamental right of all people, their communities, and their institutions to live out their most deeply held beliefs in both public and private contexts,” he says. Rev. Dr. Bennett is one of Canada’s top advocates for religious freedom, having served as Canada’s first ambassador for religious freedom. He is also a senior fellow of the Washington D.C.-based Religious Freedom Institute (RFI) where he serves as a leader of the RFI’s Action Teams for International Religious Freedom Policy and for North America. To arrange for interviews with Rev. Dr. Bennett, please, contact Daniel Proussalidis. -30- MEDIA INQUIRIESDaniel Proussalidis Cardus - Director of Communications 613-241-4500 x508 dproussalidis@cardus.ca

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 25, 2018 HAMILTON – A new case study of end-of-life care in Hamilton has found that the city’s “current infrastructure is not enough to handle the future needs of palliative care as the ‘silver tsunami’ of baby boomers draws near.” According to the study by Cardus senior researcher Doug Sikkema, Hamilton already has just 91 long-term care beds per thousand senior citizens. On average in any given month, there is a list of 762 patients waiting for a long-term care bed – where many Hamilton residents receive end-of-life care. “When it comes to end-of-life care in Hamilton there is still a significant gap between what we need and what we have,” says Sikkema in the case study. The study also found that while improving health infrastructure is important, it is insufficient on its own. Based on interviews with key stakeholders involved in palliative and end-of-life care in Hamilton, the report notes that the city needs: Community-based end-of-life care that involves more than just medical professionals providing for the needs of the dying. This would give natural caregivers, such as family, friends, and faith communities, a larger role in helping those nearing the end of their lives. Better coordination between the medical profession and other end-of-life care providers, such as hospices, home-care helpers, or community organizations. This would allow a seamless transition toward end-of-life support. A cultural transformation in how we think about, prepare for, and talk about death. This would allow for better advanced planning and preparation for the end of life. The Hamilton case study, and a companion study looking at the City of Ottawa, were released during two panel discussions on the evening of 24 April at McMaster Innovation Park. The panel discussions involved Dr. Joshua Shadd, Director of the Division of Palliative Care at McMaster University, Clare Freeman, Director of The Bob Kemp Hospice, and Rev. Dr. Bill DeJong, Pastor of Blessings Church, as well as MPPs John Fraser, France Gélinas, and Sam Oosterhoff discussing political responses to the need for better end-of-life care. -30- MEDIA INQUIRIES Daniel Proussalidis Cardus - Director of Communications 613.241-4500x508 dproussalidis@cardus.ca

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 19, 2018 HAMILTON –Fourteen teachers from eight Ontario Christian schools are on the newly released shortlist of submissions for the third annual John Rozema Awards for Teacher Excellence. The 2018 awards include a new category for submissions, Excellence in Global Perspective Teaching, sponsored by EduDeo Ministries. With $28,000 in awards, the third annual Rozema Awards will be the largest ever. “At our prize gala on June 13th in Hamilton, we will again recognize excellence as an ongoing investment into the life of a Christian school community and a positive contribution to the public good,” said Dr. Beth Green, Cardus Education program director. “And excellence in teaching is not limited to academic performance. It also includes nurturing student character, engaging the local community, and improving school culture.” The 2018 Rozema Awards Committee has shortlisted the following submissions, recognizing each school community’s reputation for giftedness and excellent practice: Excellence in Global Perspective Teaching Guido de Brès Christian High School, Hamilton - Laurie Koning Timothy Christian School, Barrie - Andrew Wilcox and Nicole Strikwerda Toronto District Christian High School - Rachael Weening Excellence in the Teaching of Creative and Performing Arts Hamilton District Christian High School - Jonathan DeVries Northumberland Christian School, Cobourg - Alison Young Timothy Christian School, Barrie - Nicole Strikwerda Excellence in Secondary Teaching London Christian High School - Corrina Cameron London Christian High School - Matt Rock Hamilton District Christian High School - Leon Hordyk Excellence in Elementary Teaching Timothy Christian School, Owen Sound - Cara Barwell Trinity Christian School, Burlington - Audrey McGregor Group Excellence Hamilton District Christian High School - Richard Van Egmond and Jared Patus* *Given the small pool of Christian schools in Ontario, there was only one submission in the Group Excellence category this year. The awards committee evaluates every submission on its merits, and is pleased to confirm the place of the single Group Excellence submission among the top tier of award applications for 2018. The John Rozema Awards for Teacher Excellence are presented in partnership with the Christian School Foundation. For more information on the awards, please, click here. -30- MEDIA INQUIRIES Daniel Proussalidis Cardus - Director of Communications 613.241-4500x508 dproussalidis@cardus.ca

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 10, 2018 OTTAWA –As Toronto City Hall gets set to regulate payday loan shops through zoning bylaws, it will need to put consumers first. Brian Dijkema, an economic specialist at think tank Cardus, tapped into extensive research on payday loans to create a new set of guidelines for municipalities. “Focusing on consumers means recognizing that the demand for short-term, small dollar loans will always be there,” argues Dijkema. “Let’s be careful not to do anything that pushes vulnerable people to use other worse options, like loan sharks or shady, under-the-table lenders.” The new municipal guidelines suggest the most important measure Toronto can take goes beyond creating new restrictions for payday loan shops. “The best way to keep people from getting caught in the payday loan trap is to offer them affordable, easy-to-access alternatives,” says Dijkema. “Cities can help create these alternatives by encouraging cooperation between community organizations and credit unions, offering the use of municipal space for these alternatives to use, and granting them access to public transit advertising space.” The guidelines also make several other recommendations: Cities should study the local market, get to know the borrowers and lenders, and collect unbiased data before enacting new payday loan zoning bylaws. Cities should avoid setting arbitrary caps on the number of payday loan shops allowed in any given area, leaving vulnerable people with fewer regulated options to use and more dependent on loan sharks or completely unregulated online lenders. Cities should take a targeted, neighbourhood-by-neighbourhood approach to zoning powers. Cities should avoid redundant licensing requirements, such as payday loan signage requirements or mandatory provision of credit counselling information, which provincial law already covers. Download a free copy of the guidelines here. -30- MEDIA INQUIRIES Daniel Proussalidis Cardus - Director of Communications 613.241-4500x508 dproussalidis@cardus.ca

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 22, 2018 OTTAWA – A newly released provincial and territorial breakdown of 2016 Census data shows that kids in Canada’s wealthiest provinces are the most likely to be growing up in families with two married parents. As Cardus reported in February of this year, less than 63 percent of Canadian kids are in families with married parents nationally now. If Quebec data are excluded, just about seven in ten kids in the rest of Canada are living with married parents. Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia are the only provinces with more than 70 percent of kids live with married parents. ***Specific data points available in report’s appendix. “Marriage is the gold standard for raising children, so it’s heartening to see that married parenting is still by far the norm in most of Canada,” says Andrea Mrozek, family program director at think tank Cardus. “Still, the trend in every part of the country is toward less marriage and more common-law parenting. Common-law relationships are more likely to break up than marriages are. And having married parents is also associated with more financial stability and kids doing better in school, so there are public policy implications as marriage declines.” The 2016 Census data also show that a majority of kids in Nunavut, the Northwest Territories, and Quebec, have parents in common-law relationships or live in single-parent homes. And with the exception of Prince Edward Island, only a small majority of kids in Atlantic Canada are living with married parents. “The research very clearly shows that marriage is more stable than cohabitation and stability matters for children,” says Mrozek. “We need to educate Canadians on this and enact public policy that reflects this reality.” The full provincial and territorial breakdown of 2016 Census family data is available online. To arrange for interviews with Andrea Mrozek, please, contact Daniel Proussalidis. -30- MEDIA INQUIRIES Daniel Proussalidis Cardus - Director of Communications 613.241-4500x508 dproussalidis@cardus.ca

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 13, 2018 OTTAWA – With even Bank of Canada Governor Stephen Poloz now suggesting that a national form of Quebec’s universal daycare model could help more women enter the workforce, it’s time to remind Canadians of what such a policy would mean. National, universal daycare decreases the choices available to mothers, makes little financial sense, and is bad policy for children and families. “Pushing even more mothers into the workforce – regardless of their desires or preferences – is using women as pawns in an economic chess game,” says Andrea Mrozek, family program director at think tank Cardus. “National daycare reduces the available choices by throwing the weight of government money behind one particular choice just to raise GDP. National daycare must by definition be coercive because shelling out billions of dollars for a program where mothers can also choose to stay home provides no impetus for the government to take it on.” Mrozek adds that Canada already has an 83 percent labour force participation rate among women, suggesting national daycare would be a frightfully expensive way of raising it even higher. “How many billions of dollars would taxpayers have to spend year after year to add a meagre four percent to Canadian women’s labour participation rate so that it equals Quebec’s?” she asks. Finally, a national imitation of Quebec’s universal daycare system would also be bad policy for children and families. A landmark study by UBC Professor Kevin Milligan, University of Toronto professor Michael Baker, and MIT’s Jonathan Gruber found Quebec’s system produces several negative outcomes: Children in Quebec’s system exhibited lower social skills, higher aggression, and higher rates of illness Parents of kids in Quebec’s system exhibited more hostile and less consistent parenting Parents of kids in Quebec’s system suffered lower health and lower quality parental relationships “National daycare isn’t done to help women or families. It’s done to help the GDP—and even there, it will fail,” says Mrozek. “Governments need to stop using gender equity language to cover up what is actually a coercive program that tells families—particularly mothers—what they ought to do.” -30- MEDIA INQUIRIES Daniel Proussalidis Cardus - Director of Communications 613.241-4500x508 dproussalidis@cardus.ca

March 1, 2018 OTTAWA – A new study finds that the Region of Waterloo’s policy of favouring one particular union for its construction contracts leaves taxpayers and most of the local construction industry out in the cold. Public policy think tank Cardus analyzed the awarding of $351.3 million worth of regional construction contracts between 2009 and 2017 for its report No Longer the Best: The Effects of Restricted Tendering on the Region of Waterloo.. The report found that the July 2014 decision to restrict construction contract bids exclusively to firms affiliated with the Carpenters’ Union had several negative effects: • Almost 84% of construction firms were shut out of the region’s construction contract work. • The average number of bidders for each project fell by 50% to less than four. • Construction firms that couldn’t win open competitions for Region of Waterloo contracts began to win contracts when their competitors were disqualified. • Contract prices began to face significant upward pressure. “The Region of Waterloo has created a coercive oligopoly that disproportionately benefits a small group of construction firms, which are able to increase their profits at taxpayers’ expense,” says Brian Dijkema, Work & Economics program director at Cardus. “This uncompetitive policy bars someone from working on a public project because of a private choice they’ve made not to be affiliated with a particular, favoured union. This is unfair, uneconomic, and uncompetitive.” Building competitive and livable communities requires effective procurement policies for construction. Cardus’s Work & Economics research program includes developing an understanding of how a competitive labour pool model can improve on some of the bidding policies employed by buyers of construction, including municipalities. As municipalities face increased infrastructure construction, maintenance, and repair costs, they will be forced to find innovative ways to ensure that their projects are completed in a cost-effective and sustainable way. Download a free copy of No Longer the Best: The Effects of Restricted Tendering on the Region of Waterloo. To arrange for interviews with Brian Dijkema, please, contact Daniel Proussalidis . -30- MEDIA INQUIRIES Daniel Proussalidis Cardus - Director of Communications 613.241-4500x508 dproussalidis@cardus.ca